Star Trek days

Hit and Miss #212

Hello!

A friend’s visiting this weekend—it’s been a lovely change from routine. We bonded long ago over a shared love for Star Trek, so the weekend’s been filled with favourite movies and episodes, plus conversations punctuated by consulting my various reference books.

A few weeks ago, on Star Trek Day (the fifty-fifth anniversary of the original series premiere, on September 8, 1966), I watched a few favourite episodes, each of which touched on a theme that I found poignant:

  • Next Generation’s “Darmok”: Two captains stranded on an unknown planet face a shared enemy—and they can’t understand each other’s speech. Dathon and Picard’s attempts to bridge a linguistic barrier is notable in its own right, but it’s the nature of that barrier that’s always fascinated me. The mysterious language is premised entirely on metaphor, requiring a deep understanding of the literature and history to which it makes references. Considering how open for interpretation history and literature can be, it’s fun to wonder at this language. What if historical study found that Darmok and Jalad had in fact not beat the Beast of Tanagra!? And a good reminder of the importance of taking the time to understand those who communicate (and thus think) differently.
  • Voyager’s “Living Witness”: Voyager’s Doctor is put on trial for crimes apparently committed hundreds of years before—but the evidence is faulty archaeological and historical analysis of problematic artefacts. This one always makes me pause to consider how we validate evidence in historical analysis, especially when such analysis plays a key role in legal proceedings.
  • Deep Space Nine’s “In the Pale Moonlight”: Sisko struggles with the strict code of morality he’s developed, ultimately accepting far darker methods than he’d ever considered in service of a greater good. This is an interesting turn for Sisko, who has long carried on a noble fight in the face of underhanded tactics. This episode arc is part of what makes DS9 so good, as it forces you to reckon with how far you’re willing to go when facing near impossible odds. (I also listened to the Women at Warp podcast episode “Ken Burns’ Deep Space Baseball Documentary”, on the DS9 documentary, which is a great analysis of the series as a whole—and a good reminder that even beloved, inspiring shows are made by people with their own issues and weaknesses.)

These episodes all portray language, history, and legacy in interesting ways—themes that continue to animate my thinking and discussions long after I’m done watching, just as Star Trek has done for so many years. Anyhow, I’m off to spend more time with my friend—all the best for the week ahead!

Lucas